Arizona’s Premier Medical Malpractice & Personal Injury Law Firm

Protecting Our Community, One Case at a Time Since 1983

Serious Injuries. Experience. Results.

Mesa Hydrocephalus Lawyer

Legal Guidance for Mesa Families After a Hydrocephalus Diagnosis

Hydrocephalus develops when cerebrospinal fluid accumulates abnormally within the brain, causing the ventricles to enlarge and potentially increasing pressure on surrounding brain tissue. In infants and children, the condition can affect neurological development and may lead to seizures, motor limitations, developmental delays, vision concerns, or other lasting medical needs.

Hydrocephalus can be present at birth or develop afterward from bleeding in the brain, infection, or complications of premature birth. When abnormal prenatal findings are not followed up, symptoms after birth are overlooked, or diagnosis and treatment are delayed, the pressure on a child’s brain can cause serious, lasting harm.

Request a Free Consultation

Use this form to get the fastest review by an attorney and the fastest response from our office.

Name(Required)
By submitting this form, you consent to receive SMS notifications from Snyder & Wenner, P.C. at the phone number provided. Message and data rates may apply. You can opt-out at any time by replying "STOP" to any message. For more information, please refer to our Privacy Policy.
Hydrocephalus Birth Injury Lawyer in Arizona

What Is Hydrocephalus?

Cerebrospinal fluid, or CSF, normally circulates through spaces within and around the brain and spinal cord. It helps protect the central nervous system and is continuously produced and absorbed by the body.

Hydrocephalus occurs when the normal circulation or absorption of this fluid is disrupted. As CSF builds up, the ventricles within the brain can enlarge and place pressure on surrounding tissue.

Hydrocephalus may be present at birth or develop later.

Potential causes in infants can include:

  • Developmental abnormalities affecting CSF flow
  • Certain congenital conditions
  • Bleeding within the brain
  • Complications associated with premature birth
  • Infection
  • Structural abnormalities involving the brain or spinal cord
  • Other conditions interfering with normal fluid circulation
  •  

Possible signs in an infant may include:

  • Rapid increase in head circumference
  • An unusually large head
  • A bulging or tense soft spot
  • Vomiting
  • Excessive sleepiness
  • Irritability
  • Feeding difficulties
  • Seizures
  • Changes in eye position
  • Developmental concerns

When these symptoms appear, imaging and neurological evaluation can confirm whether hydrocephalus is present.

Public-health surveillance shows that congenital hydrocephalus is a recognized birth condition. A CDC-supported analysis of birth-defects surveillance programs in nine U.S. states estimated congenital hydrocephalus at approximately 6.73 cases per 10,000 live births.

When Can Hydrocephalus Raise Questions About Medical Care?

A hydrocephalus case can support a legal claim when the evidence shows that a healthcare provider failed to meet the accepted standard of care and that the failure caused or contributed to additional harm.

Potential questions may involve whether providers:

  • Properly evaluated abnormal prenatal imaging
  • Followed up on concerning ventricular measurements
  • Monitored abnormal head growth after birth
  • Responded to neurological symptoms
  • Investigated unexplained vomiting or seizures
  • Ordered appropriate brain imaging when indicated
  • Recognized signs of increased intracranial pressure
  • Referred the child for further evaluation
  • Provided appropriate treatment after diagnosis
  • Monitored complications following treatment

Even when a child is born with hydrocephalus, a delay in diagnosis or treatment can allow pressure to build and cause additional neurological injury. The records can show when the condition should have been identified and how the delay harmed the child.

How Hydrocephalus May Be Detected During Pregnancy

Some forms of hydrocephalus or abnormal ventricular enlargement may be identified before birth through prenatal imaging.

An ultrasound may reveal enlarged ventricles or another structural finding involving the developing brain. Depending on the findings and stage of pregnancy, healthcare providers may recommend further imaging, additional monitoring, or evaluation by another medical professional.

Records relevant to a potential legal review can include:

  • Prenatal ultrasound reports
  • Fetal measurements
  • Follow-up imaging
  • Maternal medical records
  • Prenatal testing
  • Referral records
  • Documentation of discussions with the family

An abnormal ultrasound finding calls for follow-up. Providers are expected to recognize the finding, track it with additional imaging, and refer the family for specialized evaluation when indicated.

If significant ventricular enlargement was documented but not appropriately evaluated, a legal investigation may examine whether further monitoring or testing should have occurred.

How Hydrocephalus May Be Recognized After Birth

Not every case is identified prenatally.

After birth, pediatric healthcare providers may monitor head circumference, neurological development, feeding, muscle tone, alertness, and other clinical findings.

A steadily increasing head circumference can be one sign that additional evaluation is needed, particularly when it occurs alongside neurological symptoms.

Other possible warning signs include:

  • Repeated vomiting
  • Irritability
  • Excessive sleepiness
  • Seizures
  • Abnormal eye movement
  • Feeding difficulties
  • Changes in muscle tone
  • Delayed development

When several of these signs appear together, they call for prompt evaluation. A legal review may become relevant when a pattern of concerning findings develops and parents believe the condition was not appropriately investigated.

For example, medical records may show head circumference increasing across several visits while other neurological concerns were also documented. The investigation may consider whether the overall clinical picture reasonably called for imaging or referral.

Posted on Google Google
Chrissy Linn profile picture
Chrissy Linn
22 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was very happy with the work done on my medical malpractice case. The team was very helpful in getting all information, being open and honest about what to expect in the process, and what was realistic expectations for my case. I felt heard, and treated with respect. My questions were answered in a timely manner and they kept in contact with me regularly through out the process.
Posted on Google Google
Melissa Babel profile picture
Melissa Babel
16 August 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Outstanding from start to finish! Brian and Jen were incredibly professional, knowledgeable and thorough. Going through an unexpected, life changing event can be scary, but they put us at ease from the moment we contacted them. Every aspect of our case was handled efficiently; and we couldn't be happier with the outcome. Thank you Brian & Jen. We are eternally grateful for your hard work!!
Posted on Google Google
Heather Ballard profile picture
Heather Ballard
9 June 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Brian at Snyder and Wenner was amazing. He worked hard for as long as was needed to help us in our case even when others turned us down. He got us the best results possible and was willing to fight for us until the end.
Posted on Google Google
Alex Antilla profile picture
Alex Antilla
6 May 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Spoiler alert for those fortunate enough to be unaware - being involved in an automobile accident sucks. Having an attorney like Brian Snyder by your side throughout the process was a huge relief and helped me get through this difficult chapter in my life. Brian and his team fought hard to make me whole and I could not be more pleased with the outcome. Should you find yourself in need of a solid, hard working, and professional attorney who can help you make the most of your case, look no further than Snyder & Wenner PC! Thank you for everything, Stephanie and Brian! I’ll send you a post card from Hawaii!
Posted on Google Google
Monica Reuschel profile picture
Monica Reuschel
1 May 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We are thankful for their help with this medical malpractice case and getting us back some monies that were spent with the two surgeries needed caused by faulty hernia mesh. Thank you
Posted on Google Google
Christine Hollingsworth profile picture
Christine Hollingsworth
28 April 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Synder and Wenner were absoltuely the BEST to work with! They were understanding and patient and just so helpful! I would recommend to anyone needing representation.
Posted on Google Google
Ricardo Leon profile picture
Ricardo Leon
13 March 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Brian Snyder, attorney, was the only one who took my case more than five years ago.  I could not find an attorney in the state of Texas.  I spoke to many of the attorneys and law firms throughout Texas. I told them my symptoms were swollen lymph nodes, early signs of a recurrent hernia on my left groin, and I was always in pain.  No attorney wanted to help me throughout the state of Texas.  Brian Snyder, attorney, took my case without any hesitation.  He knew right away what I was going through.  Cause of Brian Snyder, I was able to get a settlement payment for an XL mesh plug and onlay.  I truly recommend Brian Snyder if any person is experiencing a recurrent hernia or mesh problems.  I truly recommend him as an attorney to get you results.  I consider Brian Snyder very sneaky, intelligent, with a lot of experience, and a view of common sense. Brian Snyder was very patience and understanding with my case. Brian Snyder is a very bright attorney. I wholeheartedly recommend that you give him a call. I am happy with the settlement and on my way to view and relax by the ocean. Thank you, Brian Snyder, for your help.
Posted on Google Google
Pat Petruzzelli profile picture
Pat Petruzzelli
21 January 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
One can't begin to convey the immense gratitude we have for David Wenner. We were fortunate to have his highly skilled counsel for our brother, Richard who was involved in a life changing accident through no fault of his own. The enormity of his immediate medical needs and placement in ICU for several months was more complicated with us living out of state. David and his paralegal Jen showed their humanity and compassion in helping us to navigate the insurance and legal issues while staying abreast of Richard's ever-changing condition. They allowed us to concentrate on his care and recovery which was a true blessing. Richard continues to make progress, and he is indebted to David for helping to ensure his care for the future. Thank you, David & Jen !
Posted on Google Google
jeff cody profile picture
jeff cody
25 December 2025
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Brian and his team are amazing. Not only in the work they did to get my settlement, but in how they kept me updated, and helped every step of the way. I HIGHLY recommend them, and if anything ever comes up again, Brian will be the first call I make
Posted on Google Google
David Hayes profile picture
David Hayes
22 October 2025
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
In my mind they did a excellent job on my case. No pressure one way or the other to do it a certain way. Very happy with the outcome. A shout out to Stephanie she walked (talked) me thru all the computer steps I had to take. OUTSTANDING.

How Is Hydrocephalus Treated?

Treatment generally focuses on reducing excess cerebrospinal fluid and relieving pressure on the brain.

One common treatment involves placement of a shunt. A shunt redirects CSF from the brain to another area of the body where the fluid can be absorbed.

Other children may undergo a procedure intended to create another pathway for CSF circulation.

The appropriate treatment depends on factors such as:

  • The cause of hydrocephalus
  • The child’s age
  • Severity of ventricular enlargement
  • Neurological symptoms
  • Other medical conditions

Children treated for hydrocephalus often require continued follow-up.

A shunt, for example, may require monitoring because blockage, infection, displacement, or other complications can interfere with its function.

A shunt malfunction can cause pressure to build quickly. When serious harm occurs after treatment, the legal question often involves whether healthcare providers recognized and responded to signs that the shunt was not working.

When Could Delayed Hydrocephalus Diagnosis Cause Additional Harm?

The consequences of a delayed diagnosis depend on how quickly pressure increased, the cause of the hydrocephalus, and the condition of the brain.

Continued CSF accumulation can increase pressure on brain tissue. If this pressure remains untreated, neurological damage may become more severe.

A potential malpractice investigation may therefore examine:

  • When symptoms first appeared
  • Whether head growth was appropriately monitored
  • When imaging was ordered
  • Whether referral occurred when indicated
  • When hydrocephalus was ultimately diagnosed
  • Whether treatment followed within an appropriate period
  • What neurological injury existed before and after the delay

Causation is essential. Medical evidence can show how prolonged pressure on the brain caused additional harm that earlier diagnosis and treatment would have prevented or reduced.

When Could a Hydrocephalus Case Support a Medical Malpractice Claim?

A potential claim may involve questions about prenatal care, pediatric diagnosis, neurological treatment, or follow-up after treatment.

Depending on the facts, the investigation may examine whether providers:

  • Failed to follow up on significant prenatal findings
  • Failed to monitor concerning head growth
  • Did not investigate significant neurological symptoms
  • Delayed appropriate brain imaging
  • Delayed neurological or neurosurgical referral
  • Failed to respond appropriately after diagnosis
  • Did not evaluate warning signs of a treatment complication

The evidence must establish both a departure from the accepted standard of care and a connection between that conduct and the resulting injury.

The investigation uses the records to show where the care fell short and how that failure harmed the child.

What Arizona Families Should Know About Filing Deadlines

Arizona law establishes filing deadlines for medical malpractice actions.

Under A.R.S. § 12-542, an action involving injury to another person, including a cause of action for medical malpractice, generally must be commenced within two years after the cause of action accrues.

Claims involving children can require additional analysis under Arizona law. Parents may also have claims that are legally distinct from those belonging to the child.

Families should therefore obtain guidance based on their individual circumstances rather than assume that one general filing period applies to every claim.

Earlier investigation can also help preserve prenatal, pediatric, neurological, and treatment records and establish when concerning findings first appeared.

Request a Confidential Hydrocephalus Case Review

If your child developed hydrocephalus and you have questions about prenatal, newborn, or pediatric care provided in Mesa, Snyder & Wenner can review the medical evidence and explain whether further investigation may be appropriate.

Frequently asked questions

What is hydrocephalus?

Hydrocephalus occurs when cerebrospinal fluid accumulates abnormally in the brain, enlarging the ventricles and potentially increasing pressure on surrounding brain tissue.

Yes. Some children have congenital hydrocephalus associated with developmental or structural conditions. Others develop hydrocephalus after birth because of bleeding, infection, premature birth, or another neurological condition.

Possible signs include rapid head growth, an unusually large head, a bulging soft spot, vomiting, excessive sleepiness, irritability, feeding difficulties, seizures, abnormal eye positioning, or developmental concerns.

Some cases may be suspected through prenatal ultrasound or other imaging when enlarged ventricles or related structural findings are identified. When those findings appear, follow-up imaging and specialist referral help confirm the diagnosis and plan care for delivery.

A hydrocephalus case can involve medical negligence when providers fail to meet the accepted standard of care and that failure causes or contributes to additional harm. Examples can include failing to follow up on enlarged ventricles seen on a prenatal ultrasound, failing to act on rapidly increasing head circumference, or failing to recognize signs of a shunt malfunction.

Yes. Untreated fluid buildup increases pressure on the brain, and the longer it continues, the more severe the neurological damage can become. Head-circumference measurements, imaging dates, and neurological findings can show how the delay affected the child.

Relevant records may include prenatal imaging, newborn examinations, head-circumference measurements, pediatric visits, neurological findings, brain imaging, hospital records, neurosurgical documentation, treatment records, and developmental evaluations.

Treatment commonly involves reducing excess cerebrospinal fluid and pressure. A shunt may be used to redirect fluid, while other procedures may be appropriate depending on the cause and circumstances.

Depending on the condition, a child may need neurological or neurosurgical monitoring, imaging, therapy, medication, developmental services, educational support, assistive equipment, or personal care.

Our attorneys review when abnormal findings or symptoms first appeared and how healthcare providers responded. When appropriate, we work with qualified medical professionals to evaluate the standard of care, causation, and long-term consequences before determining whether further legal action may be appropriate.