Serious
Injuries.
Experience.
Results.
When a child develops hydrocephalus, the timing of diagnosis and treatment can be critical. Parents may have questions about whether abnormal prenatal imaging was recognized, whether concerning symptoms were appropriately evaluated after birth, or whether delays in diagnosis or treatment contributed to neurological harm.
Hydrocephalus involves an abnormal buildup of cerebrospinal fluid that can increase pressure within the brain. In infants, that pressure can affect developing brain tissue and may lead to neurological problems, developmental delays, seizures, changes in head growth, or other serious medical concerns.
Snyder & Wenner, P.C. has represented Arizona patients and families in serious medical malpractice matters for more than 40 years. Our attorneys focus on complex cases involving catastrophic harm and permanent disability. When a child develops hydrocephalus and questions arise about prenatal, delivery, or newborn care, we review the medical records, reconstruct the timeline, and examine whether healthcare providers recognized and responded appropriately to concerning findings.
Use this form to get the fastest review by an attorney and the fastest response from our office.
Cerebrospinal fluid normally circulates through spaces within and around the brain and spinal cord. The fluid helps protect the nervous system, remove waste, and maintain normal pressure.
Hydrocephalus develops when cerebrospinal fluid accumulates faster than the body can circulate or absorb it. The resulting pressure can enlarge spaces within the brain known as ventricles and may affect surrounding brain tissue.
In infants, possible signs can include:
The symptoms can vary depending on how quickly hydrocephalus develops and what caused it.
Some cases begin before birth and may be detected through prenatal imaging. Others develop after delivery.
Possible causes or associated conditions can include:
The underlying cause, timing of symptoms, and medical response can all be important when evaluating whether negligent care contributed to additional harm.
Research involving infants with myelomeningocele illustrates the close relationship between certain congenital neurological conditions and hydrocephalus. In one CDC-supported study of 199 infants undergoing repair for myelomeningocele, 87.9% also had hydrocephalus. The findings underscore why prenatal imaging, newborn findings, and the child’s broader neurological history can be important when evaluating a hydrocephalus case.
The legal issue is usually whether a healthcare provider failed to meet the accepted standard of care and whether that failure caused or contributed to additional injury.
Potential questions may involve whether providers:
The timing of diagnosis and treatment can be important when the medical evidence shows that prolonged pressure or delayed intervention contributed to additional neurological harm.
That distinction is important.
The question is not simply whether hydrocephalus existed. It is whether appropriate medical care could have changed the outcome.
Hydrocephalus can sometimes be identified during pregnancy when prenatal imaging shows enlargement of the fetal ventricles or another structural abnormality.
When an imaging study raises concerns, healthcare providers may recommend additional monitoring or further evaluation depending on the findings and stage of pregnancy.
Prenatal records relevant to a legal investigation may include:
When prenatal imaging raises concerns about the developing brain, the medical record can help establish what was identified, when it was identified, and how healthcare providers responded.
After delivery, healthcare providers may monitor head circumference, neurological function, feeding, muscle tone, alertness, and other indicators.
If symptoms raise concern, diagnostic evaluation may include imaging of the brain.
The timing of diagnosis can matter because untreated or worsening hydrocephalus can increase pressure on developing brain tissue.
Hydrocephalus cases can involve medical records extending across pregnancy, birth, newborn care, and later neurological treatment.
Parents may remember being told that prenatal imaging was unusual, noticing rapid head growth after birth, seeking repeated care for unexplained symptoms, or learning only later that pressure had been building within the brain.
A legal investigation may review records such as:
The purpose is to reconstruct when concerning findings first appeared and how healthcare providers responded.
For example, repeated measurements showing abnormal head growth may be significant when considered alongside vomiting, irritability, seizures, changes in alertness, or abnormal eye movement.
The investigation may examine whether those symptoms should reasonably have prompted further testing.
If prenatal imaging is involved, the records may be reviewed to determine whether findings were recognized, communicated, and followed appropriately.
If hydrocephalus developed after intracranial bleeding or another serious newborn complication, the medical review may focus on whether the child was adequately monitored and whether treatment occurred within an appropriate period.
Snyder & Wenner evaluates these questions through the medical evidence rather than assuming that every delayed diagnosis resulted from negligence.
When appropriate, our attorneys work with qualified medical professionals to assess the applicable standard of care, the timing of diagnosis, causation, and the child’s long-term needs.
Our firm deliberately focuses on serious cases where the consequences justify substantial investigation and trial preparation.
Treatment depends on the cause, severity, and progression of the condition.
Because hydrocephalus involves abnormal cerebrospinal fluid accumulation, treatment often focuses on reducing pressure and improving fluid drainage.
One common approach involves placement of a shunt. A shunt is a medical device that redirects excess cerebrospinal fluid from the brain to another area of the body where it can be absorbed.
Some patients may undergo other procedures intended to improve fluid circulation.
Children who receive treatment may still require ongoing monitoring because hydrocephalus can remain a long-term condition.
Medical follow-up may involve:
Some children undergo additional procedures if a shunt becomes blocked, infected, displaced, or otherwise stops functioning properly.
Whether a treatment complication involves negligence depends on the particular circumstances and medical evidence. A complication alone does not establish improper care.
The long-term effects vary substantially.
Some children respond well to treatment and have limited impairment. Others experience permanent neurological or developmental consequences.
Potential long-term concerns may include:
The extent of impairment may depend on the underlying cause, the severity of pressure on the brain, other neurological conditions, and the timing of treatment.
A child with significant impairment may require ongoing support throughout childhood and possibly adulthood.
Potential future needs may include:
When medical negligence contributed to preventable additional harm, these future needs may become important in evaluating damages.
The analysis should consider the practical consequences of the injury rather than focus only on the costs incurred during the initial hospitalization.
Arizona law imposes time limits on medical malpractice actions.
Under A.R.S. § 12-542, medical malpractice actions generally must be commenced within two years after the cause of action accrues.
Cases involving children require additional legal analysis because Arizona law also contains provisions concerning minority and certain filing periods. Parents may have separate claims associated with the same events.
Families should obtain guidance based on their specific circumstances rather than assume that every claim follows the same deadline.
Earlier investigation can also help preserve relevant records and establish when symptoms or abnormal findings first appeared.
If your child developed hydrocephalus and you have questions about prenatal, newborn, or pediatric care provided in Phoenix, Snyder & Wenner can review the medical records, reconstruct the relevant timeline, and examine whether provider decisions contributed to neurological harm. We can explain the evidence and legal options available based on the circumstances of your child’s case.
Hydrocephalus is a condition in which cerebrospinal fluid accumulates within spaces in or around the brain. The buildup can increase pressure and affect brain tissue, particularly in infants whose brains are still developing.
No. Some cases are congenital and develop before birth, while others develop after delivery because of bleeding, infection, obstruction of cerebrospinal fluid flow, or another neurological condition.
Possible signs include rapid head growth, a bulging soft spot, vomiting, unusual sleepiness, irritability, feeding problems, seizures, abnormal eye positioning, and developmental concerns. Symptoms depend on the child’s age and the progression of the condition.
Some cases may be identified through prenatal imaging when enlargement of the brain’s ventricles or related abnormalities are visible. Other cases may not become apparent until after birth.
Evidence may include prenatal imaging, documentation of abnormal findings, head-circumference measurements, neurological examinations, reports of vomiting or seizures, brain imaging, referral records, treatment decisions, and the timing of interventions. The medical timeline can help determine whether healthcare providers recognized concerning findings, responded appropriately, and whether their actions contributed to additional neurological harm.
Potentially. If cerebrospinal fluid continues to accumulate and pressure increases, brain tissue may be affected. Whether an earlier diagnosis would have prevented or reduced a child’s injury must be determined from the medical evidence.
Relevant records can include prenatal ultrasounds, fetal imaging, newborn assessments, head-circumference measurements, pediatric records, neurological examinations, brain imaging, hospital records, neurosurgical documentation, and developmental evaluations.
Treatment often involves a procedure intended to redirect or improve the flow of cerebrospinal fluid. Shunt placement is one common approach. The appropriate treatment depends on the child’s condition and the cause of the hydrocephalus.
Depending on the severity of the condition, a child may need neurological or neurosurgical monitoring, imaging, therapy, medications, developmental services, educational support, assistive equipment, or personal care.
Our attorneys review the medical timeline to determine when abnormal findings or symptoms first appeared, what healthcare providers knew, and how they responded. When appropriate, we work with qualified medical professionals to evaluate the applicable standard of care, causation, and the child’s long-term medical and developmental needs. The goal is to understand what the medical evidence shows and identify the legal options supported by that evidence.
